Regardless of its plausibility, all these assumptions leave open the question

Regardless of its plausibility, all these assumptions leave open the question: who in ancient times was able to lift such heavy blocks and just set them on the previous series of stone masonry? And very much unanswered question remains, why all this was done. 
No matter how we tried to stand up for archaeologists, the only clue left this place with similarity BAALABAK. In both cases, in the western supporting wall were three huge stone (trilitony in Baalbek), established in the previous series, too, an unusually large stone blocks - held in place over several thousand years without any solution, cut in distance of several miles quarries, raised and set in place. 
We concluded that this problem only on the shoulder annunakam. 
And it could well correspond to reality, if true, my assumption of the existence of Jerusalem as the control center associated with BAALABAK ( "landing") and is part of the landing corridor annunakov built after the Flood. 
"And finally - I said when we got up to go. - Perhaps not so important: the caliph, build the house rocks, and brought his gilded dome of Baalbek, where he served as the roof of the mosque ..."